Not something you need in a high-speed chase. Motion blur tends to cause lag and blur vision while gaming. It does help in increasing FPS but at a very high cost of graphics. If you have a low-end monitor you can turn this setting off. Keep it at auto if you have a good vibrant display. It causes FPS drops and unless you have an RTX 2080 don’t even think about this. You may lose some FPS but it is worth the graphics improvement. Therefore use the highest resolution you can. Your game resolution has the highest impact on game quality.
Fullscreen mode will give you a much better gameplay experience. Especially in a racing game like NFS HEAT. Conclusion: Best graphics settings for NFS Heat Fullscreen: Fullscreenįullscreen is the best option performance and graphics wise to enjoy lag-free gaming.Post-processing Quality: Medium or High.How this works with multiplayer racing, I have no idea. If you have a lot of cars and particles on screen and your frame rate dips to 25 fps, your car in game will take longer to get from 0 to 60. If you uncap the frame rate and run the game locked at 60 fps, the world will run at 2x speed. If your computer is slow and runs the game at 20 fps, the world - your car, everything - dips to 2/3 speed. It appears that the speed at which the game simulates the world depends entirely on the frame rate. I forced some anti-aliasing on in the NVIDIA control panel to play around (which works - FXAA and a bit of MSAA added in don't appear to break anything) and, after turning it up, found out that it appears *THE GAME ACTUALLY RUNS IN SLOW MOTION IF YOUR FRAME RATE DROPS BELOW 30 FPS.* That's right, folks. Ignoring the absurd hard-coded 30fps limit, Frostbite 3 seems way overhyped IMHO if all it can do is run a series of poorly optimized "next gen" games at 30fps with little to show for it and half its features missing (like FXAA) out of "design choice" (consolization). 2.8/10 Metacritic scores (28% averaged over 200 user reviews) are low for a reason.
0 kommentar(er)
